Dr Menahem Luz,
Presocratic Philosophers
Summary 7
Pythagoras of Samos


next summary 8 [Parmenides, Zeno]
return to main menu

Contents

  1. General remarks on Pythagoras and the Pythagoreans
  2. Pythagoras of Samos
  3. Alcmaeon of Croton
  4. Philolaus of Croton
  5. Neo-Pythagoreans
  6. Conclusions

  1. General Note
    return to top

  2. Pythagoras of Samos

    return to top

  3. Alcmaeon of Croton (early 5th century BC)

    Alcmaeon was a major source for Plato and Aristotle. He was not an actual Pythagorean but a doctor, who wrote about them and whose medical theory was influenced by the Pythagorean medical tradition of Croton (Aristotle Metaphysics A 986a (Roth-Shkolnikov, p. 52). He was contemporary with Parmenides, but it is uncertain whose ideas preceded whom.

    • Cosmic Principles
      • He developed a theory of health as a constitutional balance (isonomia) whereby no elemental humour overcomes another
      • sickness results from imbalance among the elemental humours whereby one element has 'monarchy' over the others (K-R-S 310)
      • there is a dualistic principle governing all things just like all bodily parts (Metaphysics A 986a p. 52).This should be contrasted to his contemporary, Parmenides.

    return to top

  4. Philolaus of Croton

      Life
    • On the exile of the Pythagoreans from Italy, Philolaus moved to Thebae (see map) and taught there in the year that Socrates was excecuted (see tadpis p 18 no. 1)
    • He was perhaps also connected with the Pythagorean exiles at Phlius mentioned in Plato's Phaedo
    • after his death, Plato was supposed to have travelled to Italy to buy Philolaus' works (see tadpis p 18 no. 2. It is questionable how much Plato consciously borrowed from him.‡

      Beliefs
    • Reincarnation
      • Philolaus taught that life is a punishment for sins in previous reincarnations
      • suicide is thus forbidden as only the god may release us from the prison of life
        (see tadpis p 18 no. 1)

    • Harmony
      • Similar to Alcmaeon, Philolaus believed that there are dualistic principles in nature that resemble those of the cosmos (see tadpis p 18 no. 2
      • the same harmony is present in both our minds that grasp the universe and the universe itself (see tadpis p 19 no. 1)
      • every object has a mathematical number or ratio - and only through that ratio can it be known to our minds (see tadpis p 18 no. 6-8
      • Simlar to this is Aristotle Metaphysics A 986a (p 51 (= tadpis p 19 no. 5), although this passage is ascribed to the Pythagoreans in general (see tadpis p 18 no. 1

    return to top

  5. Neo-Pythagoreans
      These were groups of semi-mystical, semi-scientific thinkers who worked in the Mediterranean area during the Hellenistic and Roman periods (3rd cent. BC-2nd cent. AD). Some of their texts are attempts to Pythagorize earlier works:

      • e.g., Timaeus Locrus is a Hellenistic Pythagorean copy of Plato's Timaeus
      • or Pseudo-Architas' Categories is a late copy of Aristotle's Categories

      Besides anecdotal stories concerning Pythagoras and his pupils, they also wrote more serious introductions to arithmetic and geometry in the 1st-2nd centuries AD.

      Pythagorean work was later reabsorbed into Iamblichus' Neo-Platonic revival of Pythagoreanism in the 3rd century AD.
      Neo-Platonic Pythagoreanism and its understanding of Pythagoras' way of life left a influence on various relgions both in the west and the east.

      With the revival of Neo-Platonic texts in the Renaissance, there was also a revival of interest in Pythagoreanism, especially in the idea of the harmony of the cosmos and astrology (the belief that there is a harmony between the stars and the life of man).

    return to top

  6. Conclusions
    • Although ostensibly a school, Pythagoreanism is really a movement -- developing different interests at different times
    • In one sense, its influence is more important than what it itself propounded and believed since so little of genuinely early Pythagoreanism survives
    • As a movement, the members showed an interest in two divergent fields:
      • mysticism and the continuation of the soul
      • scientific research (especially mathematics, harmonics and medicine)
    • in Neo-Pythagoreanism, there were attempts to combine both fields as a mystical theory of science.
    return to top