Introduction
Most fishes are capable of tolerating
only a narrow range of salinities (Hanrey and Nordly, 1997). However, some
euryhaline fishes live in water bodies which experience wide range of salinity
fluctuations. The killifish, Aphanius dispar (Rüppell) (Cyprinodontidae)
is found in a wide range of salinities, from freshwater to >500% seawater
in springs around the Dead Sea and in salt ponds in Atlit, Israel (Lotan,
1969, 1971; Lotan and Skadhauge, 1972; Skadhauge and Lotan, 1974).
Lotan (1971) reported that A. dispar is capable of maintaining its
body osmotic pressure and ionic concentration within a relatively narrow
range against salinity changes from freshwater to 300% seawater in the
external water.
Increase in external osmotic pressure
may effect other physiological parameters such as osmoregulation costs,
body permeability etc. Such a situation may effect the physiological capability,
and reduce ecological fitness of the fish.
In the present study I exposed A.
dispar (Fig. 1) to different levels of salinity, from freshwater to
500% seawater for four weeks and measured the effects on swimming performance,
routine activity level and resting metabolic rate.
Fig. 1: Aphanius dispar female (above) and male (below)
Methods
Measurements of critical swimming
speed (Ucrit):
Swimming performance was measured
as critical swimming speed (Ucrit) in a water tunnel (Fig. 2). Fish were
introduced into the water tunnel (containing the relevant acclimation salinity)
2 hours before the experiment began at water velocity of 4 cm sec-1 [about
1 SL s-1]. Water velocity was then increased in increments of 4 cm sec-1
at 5 min intervals, until the fish fatigued. Ucrit was calculated according
to the equation (Brett, 1964):
Measurements of routine activity
rate:
Routine activity of the grouped
of A. dispar at different experimental salinities was measured in 6 identical
aquaria, 28X14X18 cm (length, width and height respectively) at 25±1°C.
Each aquarium contained different experimental salinity. A group of six
fish (of a certain experimental salinity) were placed in each relvant aquarium
72 h before the measurement began. Each aquarium was equipped with three
IR beam projectors with a photocell along the aquarium wall. On the opposite
aquarium wall a reflector was placed. Every 15 min number crosses were
recorded on a PC. Photoperiod was 12:12 L:D. measurement lasted 72 h.
Measurements of oxygen consumption:
Oxygen consumption rate was measured
in a semi-closed respirometer (Plaut, 1999). Postabsorptive fish was placed
in the cylindrical respirometer and left undisturbed for 3 h to recover
from handling in the relevant salinity. Then, the respirometer was sealed
without disturbing the fish and oxygen depletion rate was measured (YSI
Model 5300 Biological Oxygen Monitor).
Results
Critical swimming speed:
No significant differences were
found among fish acclimated to freshwater, 100% and 200% seawater (Fig
3, Table 1). In contrast, Ucrit of fish acclimated to 300% seawater was
significantly lower than the values above, but significantly higher than
Ucrit of fish acclimated to 400% seawater. Some of the fish acclimated
to 400% seawater did not survive the test, hence, sample size in this category
was reduced.
Table 1. Linear regression of Ucrit against standard length (±se) in Aphanius dispar acclimated to different salinities. Intercepts sharing same superscript letter are not significantly different (ANCOVA, p>0.05).
Fig. 3: Critical swimming
speeds of Aphanius dispar acclimated to different salinities.
Routine activity rate:
A. dispar showed a daily circadian
activity, being active during the light period and less active during dark
period (Fig. 4). Routine activity rates showed the same trend as Ucrit.
Fish acclimated to freshwater, 100% and 200% seawater showed similar rates
of activity, both in light and dark periods. Fish acclimated to 300% and
400% were significantly less active, while those acclimated to 400% seawater
was less active than those acclimated to 300% seawater.
Fig. 4: Routine activity
rate of Aphanius dispar acclimated to different salinities.
Oxygen consumption:
Oxygen consumption of A. dispar
was similarly high at freshwater, 100% and 200% seawater, but decreased
significantly in 300% and 400% seawater (Fig. 5).
Fig. 5: Oxygen consumption
of Aphanius dispar acclimated to different salinities.
Conclusions
References